Computer-aided Credibility Assessment by Novice Lie-Catchers
نویسندگان
چکیده
History is replete with men and women who have caused a great deal of harm and damage through skillful deception. Even though effects of deceptive actions have garnered much recent attention, deception is not a new problem. Researchers have been fascinated with deception and with credibility assessment for centuries, yet humans perform poorly when assessing credibility (Bond et al. 2006). This work presents a prototype system that unobtrusively identifies kinesic and linguistic cues that may indicate deception. This research explores improving assessment accuracy through merging improved human capabilities with system use. System use was found to significantly improve assessment ability. Training in credibility assessment was found to weakly improve assessment ability.
منابع مشابه
A Collaborative Evaluation Environment for Credibility Assessment of Modeling and Simulation Applications
Credibility assessment of modeling and simulation (M&S) applications is becoming increasingly more important as M&S applications are used more and more for complex system design evaluation, M&S-based acquisition, problem solving, military training, and critical decision making. M&S credibility assessment is a very complex process, involves the measurement and evaluation of hundreds of qualitati...
متن کاملInformation Gain of the DLST Information Gain of the Directed Lie Screening Test
We adapted the Information Gain (IG) analysis procedures described by Honts and Schweinle (2009) to the Directed Lie Screening Test (DLST; Handler, Nelson & Blalock, 2008), a comparison question technique (CQT) variant, based on the Test for Espionage and Sabotage (TES; Research Division Staff, 1995a; 1995b), evaluated using the Empirical Scoring System (ESS). IG provides an index of the increa...
متن کاملExploring Novice Raters’ Textual Considerations in Independent and Negotiated Ratings
Educators often employ various training techniques to reduce raters’ subjectivity. Negotiation is a technique which can assist novice raters to co-construct a shared understanding of the writing assessment when rating collaboratively. There is little research, however, on rating behaviors of novice raters while employing negotiation techniques and the effect of negotiation on their understandin...
متن کامل“Can You Remember What Was in Your Pocket When You Were Stung by a Bee?”: Eliciting Cues to Deception by Asking the Unanticipated
In this paper we focused on children’s deception (10-12 years, Experiment 1), and adult’s ability detect deception in children (Experiment 2). The self-presentational perspective (DePaulo, 1992) suggests that both liars and truth tellers will try to act in a convincing manner to be assessed as truth tellers. By asking unanticipated questions we put the liars in the following dilemma: If they di...
متن کاملArchitecture Scenario Analysis – Estimating the Credibility of the Results
Good decision support requires good information. A key aspect of good information is that it is credible. Presently, architecture frameworks and methods within systems engineering often lacks support for mediating the credibility of the analyses made. This paper presents a method for enterprise architecture analyses that employs an evidential reasoning algorithm for multi-attribute decision ana...
متن کامل